Hi all On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Piotrek Wasilewski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > W dniu 24 marca 2012 23:04 użytkownik Amit Pal <[email protected]> napisał: > >> Thanks to replying me. I am agree with you that more work required on >> plugin and widgets classes but that is from core apart. i was talking >> about to represent them on a page or a new look for widgets :D >> >> check using Ext-Js and extending piston section at: >> >> http://weblog.mattdorn.com/content/restful-web-apps-with-django-piston-and-ext-js/ >> >> I have worked alot on Ext-Js and i found it very easier to interact >> with Json also :) > > > I don't have any experience with the Ext-Js, but in this article it looks > pretty like the jQuery, doesn't it? We are already using jQuery in the NA, > so what would be the reasons why we should switch to Ext-Js?
The licensing of Ext-JS is a bit complicated, and it would involve some studies and efforts from us to see if we could really use it. Personally I don't like it. It looks like an effort of making "Desktop" web apps. In the other hand, making javascript consumers of our api sounds pretty neat. If we are willing to do that, I would vote for using backbone.js rather than Ext. > > -- > Piotrek > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF email is sponsosred by: > Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure > _______________________________________________ > Umit-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/umit-devel > My two cents. -- Rodolfo Carvalho Web Developer [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Umit-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/umit-devel
