> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Doherty, Chris - Elmira, ON
> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 4:22 PM
> To: unattended-info@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [Unattended] Never mind; continue about your 
> daily business ( was biosinfo.txt not found when using 
> unattended with XPSP2 integrated MV LS)
> 
> > 2 unattended.sourceforge.net Overview
> > 
> > It took me about two weeks of working with the system to 
> really wrap 
> > my head around how things worked. Hopefully I can explain 
> it a little 
> > better than the documentation did.
> 
> What I find I need to know most is exactly how to control all 
> the various scripts so they do exactly what I want to, not 
> what the developer thinks is the Right Way To Install 
> Windows.  This is why I abandoned ANI - there are too many 
> non-standard assumptions hard-coded into the config files.  
> Same thing here - AFAICT, the only way to pass a drive share 
> and credentials to Unattended for mapping the Z: drive 
> automatically without hacking the DHCP server is by either 
> rebuilding the boot CD or using PXE netboot, both of which 
> require significantly more investment of time than I've got.

You can easily modify the linux iso-image. Under Linux i.e.:
        mount isoimage to dir
        copy dir to new path
        modify isolinux.cfg
        make new iso with mkisofs

Under Windows you can use WinIso or similar... 

it works!

regards, Moritz

> 
> I'm in a fairly typical situation: we have Windows XP on the 
> desktops, we need to standardize our installs, but for legacy 
> reasons we haven't moved to Active Directory yet, otherwise 
> I'd be using RIS and not bothering with any of this.
> 
> At this point I'm planning to abandon both Unattended and ANI 
> and just write my own simple solution.  There are too many 
> deal-breakers in the setup assumptions of Unattended:
> 
> 1.1) You have to create a DNS alias of ntinstall for your 
> install server - sorry, this is a branch office.  We don't 
> have access to the DNS server.
> We're not allowed to rename servers, either.
> 1.2) You have to enable guest access to your deployment 
> server (actually, the docs imply *on your domain*).  Forget 
> it.  Not gonna happen at any Windows  shop that isn't 
> completely insane.
> 1.3) To change either 1.1 or 1.2, you have to either netboot 
> (so you can change the pxelinux cfg) which involves changing 
> the DHCP server (branch office, not gonna happen) or rebuild 
> the boot CD from scratch, which requires massive source 
> downloads, gcc, and time.  I've tried burning the boot CD to 
> a CD-RW and then overwriting the isolinux.cfg file, but 
> that's not working.
> 
> In my opinion, fixing these problems is a great deal more 
> important than allowing for custom partitioning schemes.  
> I've never seen a Windows shop that does anything but one 
> large NTFS primary for their workstations.
> 
> Not to mention the scripts themselves:
> 
> 2.1) use strict; ?  Okay, while we're at it, how about use 
> english; use warnings ; use 
> variable_names_that_make_some_kind_of_sense ; use 
> an_architecture_diagram_and_stick_to_it ; use 
> comments_that_adequately_document_your_code ; ...
> 2.2) sub{}s go at the end of the file, not embedded in your 
> primary script logic.
> 2.3) Variables go at the top of the file, not embedded in 
> your primary script logic.
> 2.4) Too many scripts in too many locations, none of which 
> are documented.
> Jumping back and forth between the boot medium, c:\netinst, 
> z:\dosbin, and z:\scripts without any indication of how and 
> when script execution is handed off (or why) makes the system 
> nigh-unmodifiable.
> 
> I would guess that the majority of people who need an 
> unattended system like this are working in a largish office 
> environment with some pretty straightforward and standardized 
> needs that are _not_ going to match the assumptions in 
> unattended.  But in its current state, 4.6 is basically 
> unmodifiable without, as you mentioned, spending two weeks 
> wrapping one's head around it.  I've spent a week working on 
> this, and right now I'm going to spend an afternoon building 
> a Bart's Network Boot Disk, and an unattend.txt on a network 
> share, and that will work just fine.  Software package 
> installs I can do from within unattend.txt.
> 
> Chris Doherty
> Helpdesk Analyst
> Crompton Co./Cie a Chemtura Company
> Elmira: (519) 669-1671 x319
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App 
> Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" 
> plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: 
> http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
> _______________________________________________
> unattended-info mailing list
> unattended-info@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
unattended-info mailing list
unattended-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info

Reply via email to