> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Doherty, Chris - Elmira, ON > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 4:22 PM > To: unattended-info@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: [Unattended] Never mind; continue about your > daily business ( was biosinfo.txt not found when using > unattended with XPSP2 integrated MV LS) > > > 2 unattended.sourceforge.net Overview > > > > It took me about two weeks of working with the system to > really wrap > > my head around how things worked. Hopefully I can explain > it a little > > better than the documentation did. > > What I find I need to know most is exactly how to control all > the various scripts so they do exactly what I want to, not > what the developer thinks is the Right Way To Install > Windows. This is why I abandoned ANI - there are too many > non-standard assumptions hard-coded into the config files. > Same thing here - AFAICT, the only way to pass a drive share > and credentials to Unattended for mapping the Z: drive > automatically without hacking the DHCP server is by either > rebuilding the boot CD or using PXE netboot, both of which > require significantly more investment of time than I've got.
You can easily modify the linux iso-image. Under Linux i.e.: mount isoimage to dir copy dir to new path modify isolinux.cfg make new iso with mkisofs Under Windows you can use WinIso or similar... it works! regards, Moritz > > I'm in a fairly typical situation: we have Windows XP on the > desktops, we need to standardize our installs, but for legacy > reasons we haven't moved to Active Directory yet, otherwise > I'd be using RIS and not bothering with any of this. > > At this point I'm planning to abandon both Unattended and ANI > and just write my own simple solution. There are too many > deal-breakers in the setup assumptions of Unattended: > > 1.1) You have to create a DNS alias of ntinstall for your > install server - sorry, this is a branch office. We don't > have access to the DNS server. > We're not allowed to rename servers, either. > 1.2) You have to enable guest access to your deployment > server (actually, the docs imply *on your domain*). Forget > it. Not gonna happen at any Windows shop that isn't > completely insane. > 1.3) To change either 1.1 or 1.2, you have to either netboot > (so you can change the pxelinux cfg) which involves changing > the DHCP server (branch office, not gonna happen) or rebuild > the boot CD from scratch, which requires massive source > downloads, gcc, and time. I've tried burning the boot CD to > a CD-RW and then overwriting the isolinux.cfg file, but > that's not working. > > In my opinion, fixing these problems is a great deal more > important than allowing for custom partitioning schemes. > I've never seen a Windows shop that does anything but one > large NTFS primary for their workstations. > > Not to mention the scripts themselves: > > 2.1) use strict; ? Okay, while we're at it, how about use > english; use warnings ; use > variable_names_that_make_some_kind_of_sense ; use > an_architecture_diagram_and_stick_to_it ; use > comments_that_adequately_document_your_code ; ... > 2.2) sub{}s go at the end of the file, not embedded in your > primary script logic. > 2.3) Variables go at the top of the file, not embedded in > your primary script logic. > 2.4) Too many scripts in too many locations, none of which > are documented. > Jumping back and forth between the boot medium, c:\netinst, > z:\dosbin, and z:\scripts without any indication of how and > when script execution is handed off (or why) makes the system > nigh-unmodifiable. > > I would guess that the majority of people who need an > unattended system like this are working in a largish office > environment with some pretty straightforward and standardized > needs that are _not_ going to match the assumptions in > unattended. But in its current state, 4.6 is basically > unmodifiable without, as you mentioned, spending two weeks > wrapping one's head around it. I've spent a week working on > this, and right now I'm going to spend an afternoon building > a Bart's Network Boot Disk, and an unattend.txt on a network > share, and that will work just fine. Software package > installs I can do from within unattend.txt. > > Chris Doherty > Helpdesk Analyst > Crompton Co./Cie a Chemtura Company > Elmira: (519) 669-1671 x319 > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App > Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" > plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: > http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php > _______________________________________________ > unattended-info mailing list > unattended-info@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ unattended-info mailing list unattended-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info