Am 08.02.19 um 16:58 schrieb Wouter Wijngaards via Unbound-users: > This seems to be bug#4225, for which there is a fix in the code > repository. It was just fixed an hour ago. The patch for it is this, I > think: Hello Wouter, https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/bugs-script/show_bug.cgi?id=4225 also mention an other fix in qname minimisation. do you suggest to apply both or will there a next version soon? Andreas > > > Index: services/listen_dnsport.c > =================================================================== > --- services/listen_dnsport.c (revision 5105) > +++ services/listen_dnsport.c (working copy) > @@ -1779,6 +1779,12 @@ > /* If mesh failed(mallocfail) and called commpoint_send_reply with > * something like servfail then we pick up that reply below. */ > if(req->is_reply) { > + /* reply from mesh is in the spool_buffer */ > + sldns_buffer_clear(c->buffer); > + sldns_buffer_write(c->buffer, > + sldns_buffer_begin(req->spool_buffer), > + sldns_buffer_limit(req->spool_buffer)); > + sldns_buffer_flip(c->buffer); > goto send_it; > } > > > > Best regards, Wouter > >>> >>> >>> >>> dig say “WARNING: recursion requested but not available”, >>> >>> kdig say “WARNING: response QR bit not set” >>> >>> >>> >>> Back to 1.8.3, everthing work fine. >> can't reproduce: >> >> $ dig @::1 version.bind. txt ch +short >> "unbound 1.9.0" >> >> $ for i in 1 2 3 ; do dig @::1 twitter.com +tcp +short; done >> 104.244.42.193 >> 104.244.42.65 >> 104.244.42.193 >> 104.244.42.65 >> 104.244.42.65 >> 104.244.42.193 >> >> any special configuration / compile options? >> >> Andreas >>
bug#4225 (was: unbound 1.9 respone wrong answer (from cache?) when dig +tcp used.)
A. Schulze via Unbound-users Fri, 08 Feb 2019 08:30:11 -0800
- unbound 1.9 respone wrong answer (from... Punk[D.M] via Unbound-users
- Re: unbound 1.9 respone wrong ans... Yuri via Unbound-users
- Re: unbound 1.9 respone wrong ans... A. Schulze via Unbound-users
- Re: unbound 1.9 respone wrong... Wouter Wijngaards via Unbound-users
- bug#4225 (was: unbound 1.... A. Schulze via Unbound-users
- Re: bug#4225 (was: un... Wouter Wijngaards via Unbound-users
