On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote:
It is an entry in a different table internally. The local zones, stubs,
forwarders, have their own lookup tables. It seems to cause grief over
the forwarder/stub lookup as well.
Operators expect the most specific. But the application has a simple
ordering, first check local-zone, then check forwards, then stubs.
I'd definately expect most specific for any configured trust anchor.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Unbound-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users