At Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:27:02 +0200, Ondô ùej Surý <[email protected]> wrote: Subject: Re: [Unbound-users] NOTIFY implementation to unbound > > So if I send you NOTIFY . (the root), you flush the whole cache? And > if I send you a notify for .cz, you will walk through the whole cache > and flush everything which ends in .cz or .com? I don't know exact > design of unbound cache, but I guess it's more hash like table then > tree like table, so how would you do that and not lock down whole > resolving meanwhile?
Exactly -- and as you say in your subsequent reply, the table will be
locked. For me, in this scenario, performance is secondary.
Note that _you_ cannot send any valid NOTIFY to my nameserver(s) -- only
my own authorized authoritative nameservers can send NOTIFY messages
that will be honoured. Or at least that's the goal of a correct
configuration. :-)
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP RoboHack <[email protected]>
Planix, Inc. <[email protected]> Secrets of the Weird <[email protected]>
pgpaQCwQQw0HD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
