-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
On 11/26/2010 10:40 AM, [email protected] wrote: >>> Yes, but i'm a little bit baffled that identical records are returned. >>> Does unbound cache it this way or are the records subtil different? >> >> Unbound just returns what the authoritative nameserver sent. Yes. It caches what the authority server sends. For speed reasons it does not (try to) remove duplicates. Except in special corner cases where it does remove duplicates (where it tries to make sense of RRSIGs that are in the wrong section of the message, and when it thus adjusts the message it removes duplicates). >> BIND removes duplicate nameserver addresses from responses, it seems. Unbound does not introduce duplicates itself, but also does not remove them if the authority server sends them like that. Unbound preserves the exact order of the records as well. > As it does not hurt i will simply ignore it further on. > > Thanks for your input > > Andreas Best regards, Wouter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkz1FjwACgkQkDLqNwOhpPiwAACZAeG7c4l5BLWefW49rO0R/SRb C/UAn1r3SwCP9/PeuJcSFzE7INtm067K =vsV7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
