Peter Constable wrote: > Doug Ewell responded: > >> an image of mathematical or engineering equations wouldn’t exactly be >> the best supporting evidence for encoding them in plain text. > > Not only would it not be the best supporting evidence, it wouldn’t be > considered supporting evidence _at all_ since math formula layout is > not plain text.
There was an implied tone of voice and rolling of eyes in my post. I didn’t include an emoji to convey that. Andreas Prilop replied: >> Andreas says below, >> >>> Just one example where the notorious Opentype makeshift would not be >>> a preferable solution and where hard-coding will be needed: > > What?? > > The person who wrote this is A. Stötzner, not Andreas [Prilop]. “A. Stötzner” is also named Andreas: http://luc.devroye.org/fonts-43707.html -- Doug Ewell, CC, ALB | Lakewood, CO, US | ewellic.org
