-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 My reply to Doug. Julian , Otto, Jim and all you attackers.
"focus on the originating question because as you see I was dumped on with over 5 pages of unrelated and offtopic nonsense in reply to my single line question. " ( https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/2024-November/011111.html ) " with about 18 pages of replies it is getting hard to track and some mail I couldn't even find before replying, " ( https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/2024-November/011139.html ) begun Sat Nov 2 19:42:46 CDT 2024 25 replies from 12 senders. Notice they all instantly pose arguments and personal attacks against me whilst babbling on with conflicting, scattered, and wrong technical jargon. Because these posts betwixt each other contradict and conflict each other you might expect those posters would correct each other but no all 25 mails by 12 guys target the inquirer. Here is an example of one all you attackers could have corrected: @Julian says "There are no codepages in Unicode. (Or I suppose there is exactly one.)" ( https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/2024-November/011116.html ) does conflict with @Otto says "UTF-8 is one method (of a handfull of standardized methods) to represent Unicode text at the bit level in order to conveniently transfer, or store, it." ( https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/2024-November/011132.html ) @Jim says he is putting up a post like a seeing eye dog by pasting from my GitHub ( https://www.github.com/freedom-foundation ) "I summarised what I understand of your project as a courtesy to my fellow unicode-list subscribers. " I chuse this example because it goes to show that Unicode consortium is disappointed. You will probably read in there somewhere that it intended to solve a problem of many codepages hower you see that it has become something more complicated than the problem it were to simplify to solve. from [email protected] Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Thursday, November 7th, 2024 at 05:25, Doug Ewell via Unicode <[email protected]> wrote: > Many companies, fearful that their employees may click on malicious links in > emails and put the business at risk, have begun sending out so-called “phish > alert” messages. These are simulated phishing emails that contain many of the > tell-tale signs of real attacks, complete with phony links that redirect to > the company’s IT department. The object is to see how many, and perhaps > which, employees report the email as phishing and how many take the bait and > click on the links. > > I feel like we are living inside such an experiment with this thread. > > -- > Doug Ewell, CC, ALB | Lakewood, CO, US | ewellic.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: ProtonMail wnUEARYKACcFgmctlQIJkKkWZTlQrvKZFiEEZlQIBcAycZ2lO9z2qRZlOVCu 8pkAAOAMAQDOLUYx2VnvbtEIMrHfl0WM1kF1lhvDXQd5Wpob8s6jeAEA9BmR mLEFEOp6R4/s7o+XQNfaswCmNuI65a6rHEsi0Ao= =j6r0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
publickey - [email protected] - 0x66540805.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
publickey - [email protected] - 0x66540805.asc.sig
Description: PGP signature
