On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 5:11โ€ฏPM Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode <
[email protected]> wrote:

> We can find the discussion in the list archives somewhere. Suffice to
> say, แบž does seem to be a real thing and seems to have been so even
> before it was recognized.
>

No one here questions whether it's the real thing.

My question is whether it is in customary use, with higher frequency than
SS, in all-caps text where there is nothing holding the
authors/publishers/producers/advertisers back from using it.

What I have been able to find so far points to some use, but less use than
SS or รŸ.
I am looking forward to convincing evidence of the opposite.

markus

Reply via email to