Asmus Freytag replied to Steffen Nurpmeso: > The remainder of your post unfortunately descends into irrelevant and > opinionated editorializing, so there's little constructive to add to > in a reply.
I wouldn’t have been as charitable; the following was completely uncalled for and demands an apology: >> [...] And then really, necessarily there is >> not only eszett which is no(t) (longer) sz as the name es-zett >> implies (wrongly referred to in Unicode, likely with malicious >> anti-german intention) -- Doug Ewell, CC, ALB | Lakewood, CO, US | ewellic.org
