On 4/27/2025 4:14 PM, Doug Ewell via Unicode wrote:
Matthew Tameirao wrote:
The scripts I'm proposing are constructed scripts from Omniglot for
scripts that are needed in the UCS.
Before writing the formal proposal(s) — which you will need to do for these to
even be considered — can you briefly explain why these constructed scripts are
“needed in the UCS”?
There's no requirement to explain this here on this list, but a lack of
a well reasoned and fully documented explanation in a formal proposal
will doom its success. Not all possible rationales from the perspective
of a submitter are acceptable from the perspective of the Script
Encoding Working Group.
The bar is very high for encoding constructed scripts, especially recently
invented scripts intended solely, or primarily, for constructed languages.
Indeed.
A./
