John Cowan wrote: > I think the implication is that the OS provides an interface to read > characters out of a text file, in which case BOM-eating BOMophagy, aka FEFFagy ;-) > (and masking the > difference between various text encodings) is very sensible. Historic > OSes have not had such an interface, but Plan 9 does: getrune, putrune, > etc. And how very sensible this is, now that Unicode has encoded runes (U+16A0 ff.), so that you can call getrune() and actually get a rune! --Ken
- Re: UTF-8N? Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-8N? Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8N? Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-8N? Doug Ewell
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? Markus Scherer
- Re: UTF-8N? Robert A. Rosenberg
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- RE: UTF-8N? Kenneth Whistler
- RE: UTF-8N? Preethi Balaji
- RE: UTF-8N? Jonathan Rosenne
- RE: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8N? Asmus Freytag
- Re: UTF-8N? Doug Ewell
- Re: UTF-8N? Doug Ewell