At 4:27 AM -0800 7/12/00, Michael Everson wrote:
>Ar 10:23 -0800 2000-07-11, scríobh Jon Babcock:
>
>>But covering the jiaguwen [J. koukotsumoji] (oracle bone script) is
>>another story. First of all, it's a moving target.
>
>Isn't it best treated as a font variant of CJK?
>
That's really an open question. We'd need to get a solid survey of
the oracle bone characters and their modern counterparts. One problem
is that a significant percentage of the former aren't identified (or
even identifiable) with modern characters.
--
=====
John H. Jenkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blueneptune.com/~tseng
