Re: 127 strokes beyond the radical?!

[Rick McGowan]

> I do not suppose that characters of 128+ strokes are indeed
> possible, due to the fact that the paper would get quite soggy
> from the repeated strokes.

Well, if they get soggy on little paper just write 'em on bigger paper!

In any case, your supposition is not adequately informed.  For instance, check out:
        Stevens, John
                Sacred Calligraphy of the East

which you can find at:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1570621225/qid%3D964198889/002-3555686-2525626


        Rick