[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Why does it say there are three varieties when a 16-bit datum can only be > serialised in two orders? The simplest way to think about it is to remember that a MIME charset is meant to provide *minimal* information for the receiver to convert bytes into characters. If the receiver gets FF FE 01 02, then it *must* be interpreted as follows depending on the charset: UTF-16: U+0201 UTF-16BE: U+FFFE U+0102 UTF-16LE: U+FEFF U+0201 For any given byte sequence, at most two of the charsets produce a meaningful sequence of characters, since U+FFFE is not a character, but that doesn't affect charset decoding. -- Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: Unicode in VFAT file system Jonathan Rosenne
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Peter_Constable
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Peter_Constable
- RE: Unicode in VFAT file system Marco . Cimarosti
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Peter_Constable
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Mark Davis
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Peter_Constable
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system John Cowan
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: Unicode in VFAT file system John Cowan
- RE: Unicode in VFAT file system Asmus Freytag
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Peter_Constable
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Asmus Freytag
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Peter_Constable
- RE: Unicode in VFAT file system Jonathan Rosenne
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system addison
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system addison
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system addison