> Does the field in question need to support literally any possible character > in Unicode 3.0 and beyond (since 3.0 does not have any surrogates > assigned!)? > > True, but within a year or so, there *will* be surrogates assigned in Unicode. One cannot be premature in supporting them at this point. ===== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blueneptune.com/~tseng
- Oracle and Surrogate Pairs Mikko Lahti
- Re: Oracle and Surrogate Pairs Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Oracle and Surrogate Pairs Jianping Yang
- RE: Oracle and Surrogate Pairs Mikko Lahti
- Re: Oracle and Surrogate Pairs Jianping Yang
- FW: Oracle and Surrogate Pairs John H. Jenkins
- FW: Oracle and Surrogate Pairs samir . mehrotra
- Re: Oracle and Surrogate Pairs Peter_Constable
- Re: Oracle and Surrogate Pairs Jianping Yang
- Re: Oracle and Surrogate Pairs Mark Davis
- Re: FW: Oracle and Surrogate Pairs Edward Cherlin
- RE: FW: Oracle and Surrogate Pairs Michael Kung