> Does the field in question need to support literally any possible character 
> in Unicode 3.0 and beyond (since 3.0 does not have any surrogates 
> assigned!)? 
>  
>  

True, but within a year or so, there *will* be surrogates assigned in Unicode.  One 
cannot be premature in supporting them at this point.


=====
John H. Jenkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blueneptune.com/~tseng

Reply via email to