Ooops! In my previous message, I wrote: > wchar_t * _wcschr_32(const wint_t * s, wchar_t c); > wchar_t * _wcsrchr_32(const wint_t * s, wchar_t c); What I actually wanted to write is: wchar_t * _wcschr_32(const wchar_t * s, wint_t c); wchar_t * _wcsrchr_32(const wchar_t * s, wint_t c); Sorry if this puzzled you. _ Marco ______________________________________________ La mia e-mail è ora: My e-mail is now: >>> marco.cimarostiªeurope.com <<< (Cambiare "ª" in "@") (Change "ª" to "@") ______________________________________________ FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
- string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode] addison
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unico... Mark Davis
- RE: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unico... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unico... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unico... addison
- RE: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unico... addison
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unico... Antoine Leca
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unico... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unico... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unico... David Starner
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unico... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unico... John Cowan
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unico... addison
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unico... Mark Davis