On Tuesday, January 30, 2001, at 12:19 PM, David Starner wrote: > Of those in the registry, I would guess only 8 (Tengwar, Cirth, > Engsvanyali, Shavian, Solresol, Visible Speech, Aiha, and Klingon) have > any > claim to be added to Unicode. 78 columns, less than 624 characters to be > added. Don't forget Deseret, which will, in fact, be part of Unicode 3.1. (Shavian has also been accepted by UTC for encoding; it's just that nobody has really pushed on it so it's languished.)
- ConScript registry? Elaine Keown
- Re: ConScript registry? David Starner
- Re: ConScript registry? Thomas Chan
- Re: ConScript registry? John Jenkins
- Re: ConScript registry? David Starner
- Re: ConScript registry? DougEwell2
- Re: ConScript registry? Michael Everson
- Re: ConScript registry? Michael Everson
- Re: ConScript registry? Michael Everson
- Re: ConScript registry? Michael Everson
- Re: ConScript registry? P. T. Rourke
- Re: ConScript registry? Michael Everson
- Re: ConScript registry? DougEwell2
- Re: ConScript registry? Thomas Chan