On 02/21/2001 10:55:09 PM "Joel Rees" wrote: >Now I happen to be of the opinion that the attempt to proclaim the set >closed at 17 planes is a little premature. For better or worse, not only is it not premature, it's a done deal! - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485 E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate ... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Antoine Leca
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Peter_Constable
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Cathy Wissink
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Joel Rees
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Tom Lord
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Peter_Constable
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Carl W. Brown
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Tom Lord
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Tex Texin
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Joel Rees
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Joel Rees
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Peter_Constable
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Ayers, Mike
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... John Cowan