Mike, I resisted calling it FTF-8 (Funky Transfer Format - 8), but if you want to call it Weird Transfer Format - 8, I don't have any real objections. Carl -----Original Message----- From: Ayers, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 9:47 AM To: 'Carl W. Brown'; Simon Law; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signature in web and email) If you have this funny encoding please don't call it UTF8 because it is not UTF8 and will only confuse users. You could call it OTF8 or something like that but not UTF8. How about "WTF-8"? Sorry - I couldn't resist. /|/|ike
- RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signatur... てんどうりゅうじ
- Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signatur... Simon Law
- RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 sig... Carl W. Brown
- Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 sig... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 sig... Carl W. Brown
- RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signatur... Ayers, Mike
- Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signatur... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signatur... Vaintroub, Wladislav
- RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 sig... Christopher John Fynn
- RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signatur... Ayers, Mike
- RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 sig... Carl W. Brown
- RE: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8 (was RE: UTF-8 signatur... Ayers, Mike