Mark Davis wrote: > - I am well aware that one can accept 6-byte supplementary > characters on > input in UTF-8. (Did you really think I wasn't?) (O, no, I know you knew!) But how should this 6-byte sequence be interpreted by a standard UTF-8 decoder? Does it become one or two code points? _ Marco
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Mark Davis
- RE: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Marco Cimarosti
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Mark Davis
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Carl W. Brown
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Mark Davis
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Mark Davis
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Marco Cimarosti
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Mark Davis
- RE: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Marco Cimarosti
- RE: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Carl W. Brown
- RE: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Misha . Wolf
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Mark Davis
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Markus Scherer
- RE: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Carl W. Brown
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Peter_Constable