Re: UTF8 vs AL32UTF8

[Misha Wolf]

On 11/06/2001 16:18:15 Mark Davis wrote:
[...]

> - Oracle could probably make a case for their name for UTF8 simply being an
> anachronism. After all, the original definition of UTF-8 did convert
> surrogate pairs as they are doing in what they call UTF8.

Which original definition?

Misha



-----------------------------------------------------------------
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.