Markus Scherer wrote: > > This means that Oracle mis-implemented the UTF-8 standard as it was specified at >that time, starting at least with Unicode 2.0. > No, Oracle does not mis-implement the UTF-8 standard but only limit its support to BMP only. Except the backward compatibility reason, Oracle also needed to be compatible with other database vendors such as IBM and Sybase's UTF-8 support up to BMP only and Microsoft SQL Server Unicode support to UCS2 then. Regards, Jianping.
begin:vcard n:Yang;Jianping tel;fax:650-506-7225 tel;work:650-506-4865 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:Server Gobalization Technology;Server Technology version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Senior Development Manager adr;quoted-printable:;;500 Oracle Packway=0D=0AM/S 659407;Redwood Shores;CA;94065; fn:Jianping Yang end:vcard
