At 07:04 +0100 2001-07-04, David Starner wrote:
>I'm curious why Shavian is up for standardization before Tengwar and Cirth.
>They're all constructed scripts by authors (or at least for authors)
>of the 20th century, the only big difference being that one was used
>for one book and the others have a decent body of users (not huge,
>but probably bigger than Cherokee.)
Shavian is really easy. Sorting out Cirth is complex because there
are a number of sources to bring together. Tengwar is, in fact, a
rather complex writing system.
--
Michael Everson
