At 11:56 -0700 2001-07-06, Kenneth Whistler wrote:

>Tengwar is a completely different case. It meets all the
>criteria, and is appropriate to have on the Roadmap. That doesn't
>mean that it is a high priority -- in fact, as has been pointed
>out, more energy has been spent gassing about it on this
>list than has actually gone into encoding it. But in any
>case I consider it inappropriate to keep labelling it a
>"fictional" script. It is a real script and people use it.

The Roadmap describes Tengwar, Cirth, and Blissymbols as "Scripts for 
invented languages".
-- 
Michael Everson

Reply via email to