"Becker, Joseph" wrote:
>
> > Unicode is going to stick with the KangXi radical system
>
> There Unicode goes again, flouting the will of the people ... while
> meanwhile in another thread an esteemed Unicode elder has proposed the death
> radical. It's time to bring this system into the 21st Century: where's the
> plastics radical, the fast-food radical, the unix radical?!
>
Joe,
It sounds like you're talking about productive innovation in the script.
Watch out! Here come another 50,000 characters!
-Richard
