> Unfortunately, you don't hear much about SCSU, and in particular the Unicode > Consortium doesn't really seem to promote it much (although they may be > trying to avoid the "too many UTF's" syndrome). Probably that's one point. But also, SCSU is something that's a little more complicated to use, and needs to be pretty well negotiated between sender and receiver. It's much less suitable for general-purpose interchange. Rick
- More about SCSU (was: Re: A UTF-8 based News Ser... DougEwell2
- RE: More about SCSU (was: Re: A UTF-8 based... Yves Arrouye
- Re: More about SCSU (was: Re: A UTF-8 based... DougEwell2
- Re: More about SCSU (was: Re: A UTF-8 based... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: More about SCSU (was: Re: A UTF-8 based... DougEwell2
- Re: More about SCSU (was: Re: A UTF-8 based... Rick McGowan
- Re: More about SCSU (was: Re: A UTF-8 based... David Starner
- RE: More about SCSU (was: Re: A UTF-8 based... Yves Arrouye