>>Peter Constable thought maybe a "couple" and you illustrate >>no additional characters required. >> >>I'll split the difference and say one. > >With the lower case... it's a "couple", isn't it? I meant the upper / lower of what I think Marco proposed as 413+321, but I'm not sure these should be represented using 0321. Ken indicated that he thought it should not be represented that way and was, indeed, missing. - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485 E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: Errata in language/script list: xUSSR languages Peter_Constable
- Re: Errata in language/script list: xUSSR languages James Kass
- RE: Errata in language/script list: xUSSR languages Hohberger, Clive
- RE: Errata in language/script list: xUSSR languages Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Errata in language/script list: xUSSR languages Rick McGowan
- Re: Errata in language/script list: xUSSR languages James Kass
- Re: Errata in language/script list: xUSSR languages James Kass
- RE: Errata in language/script list: xUSSR languages John Hudson
- Re: Errata in language/script list: xUSSR languages Kairat A. Rakhim
- Re: Errata in language/script list: xUSSR languages Peter_Constable
- Re: Errata in language/script list: xUSSR languages Kairat A. Rakhim
- RE: Errata in language/script list: xUSSR languages Carl W. Brown
- Errata in language/script list: xUSSR languages Kairat A. Rakhim