> I'm studying ways to provide Linux with unicode-compliant Myanmar > character fonts. Mark Leisure use .bdf format to enable to enter > unicode values easily for some Indic fonts. With reference to that, > I did .bdf !!! How did you do it? With two preprocessors? The first reorders the input characters, the second maps the reordered characters to composite glyphs? > Now, my MS Windows platform friends are doing Open Type. Then, I > became to think that it would be nice that we use the same format > regardless of the platform and there I'm stuck:( If the font works with Windows, it works with Linux also (using FreeType). The only thing needed is the reordering preprocessor. > Btw, am I digging the right thing? Sould I just stick with .bdf at > the moment???? It depends. For a terminal, BDF is optimal. For printing, you need outline fonts. Werner
- Opentype support under Liunx Myanmar Triumph Int'l Ltd.
- Re: Opentype support under Liunx John Hudson
- Re: Opentype support under Liunx Yung-Fong Tang
- Re: Opentype support under Liunx Myanmar Triumph Int'l Ltd.
- Re: Opentype support under Liunx Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: Opentype support under Liunx Werner LEMBERG
- Re: Opentype support under Liunx Myanmar Triumph Int'l Ltd.
- Re: Opentype support under Liunx David Starner
- Re: Opentype support under Liunx Myanmar Triumph Int'l Ltd.
- Re: Opentype support under Liunx Werner LEMBERG
- Re: Opentype support under Liunx David Starner
- Re: Opentype support under Liunx Werner LEMBERG
- Re: Opentype support under Liunx Thierry Sourbier
- Re: Opentype support under Liunx Myanmar Triumph Int'l Ltd.
- Re: Opentype support under Liunx Alejandros Diamandidis
- Re: Opentype support under Liunx Jungshik Shin
- Re: Opentype support under Liunx Jungshik Shin