Wed, 12 Sep 2001 11:08:41 -0700, Julie Doll Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> Proposed Draft Unicode Technical Report #26: Compatibility Encoding
> Scheme for UTF-16: 8-Bit (CESU-8) is now available at:
> http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr26/
IMHO Unicode would have been a better standard if UTF-16
hadn't existed. Just UTF-8 and UTF-32, code points in the range
U+0000..7FFFFFFF, no surrogates, no confusion about "how many bits is
Unicode", an ASCII-compatible encoding in most external transmissions,
uniform width for internal processing, and practically no byte
ordering issues. Much simpler.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
\__/
^^ SYGNATURA ZASTĘPCZA
QRCZAK
