David Hopwood wrote: > We can *guess* what the column two glyphs look like from the descriptions, > I suppose, but isn't it kind of important to have images of them?
Heh... Well, yeah, theoretically. We just don't have any glyphs for some
of the things in column 2. The items in column 1 will eventually show up
the next time we update reference glyphs for the BMP; but the variants in
column 2 I'm a trifle worried about...
Rick
