In a message dated 2002-01-27 18:51:35 Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> First, have we all servers? No. Assuming we all do is no better than assuming we all have broadband or T1 connections. > Second, if it is a small attachment, the number of bytes transmitted to GO > there may well be greater than the number to send the bloody thing. How > about an arbitrary attachment limit of 1535 >(Œê˜C‡‚킹F‚Ђ߂݂±) bytes? I just sent a 500-byte attachment to the Unicode list without any qualms. Almost all messages are longer than 500 bytes, especially when you take headers into account. However, there is certainly such a thing as "too long," and I have no idea where to draw the line and say "this attachment is short enough, that one is too long." -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California
