On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, John H. Jenkins wrote: > Thomas, do you have a reference for U+9EBC (麼) and U+9EBD (麽) being > different? The only dictionary I have which contains both is the > (traditional) CiHai, it and it claims they're variants of each other.
Belated, but a little more on these two. "Annex T: Procedure for the Unification and Arrangement of CJK Ideographs"[1] (AMD8 of ISO/IEC 10646-1:1993) at the very end of section T.3, gives this pair as an example of unification blocked by source separation (a T source is the culprit). [1] ftp://ftp.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/pub/irg/AnnexT.rtf Thomas Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
