On Saturday, March 16, 2002, at 08:08 PM, Curtis Clark wrote:
> At 04:45 PM 3/16/02, Doug Ewell wrote: >> But right away that definition includes not only Shavian, Tengwar, >> Cirth, Klingon, and most of the contents of ConScript, but also >> Ethiopic, Cherokee, Canadian Syllabics, Gothic, Deseret, and maybe Yi >> Syllabics, all of which are already encoded in Unicode. > > And iirc Cyril and Methodius were people, although their script was based > on Greek and continued to evolve. > Well, not to mention Hangul. Basically, the place where I personally would draw the line is between having a body of people (size left vague) who want to interchange data in the script, or if there is a historic body of literature in the script. ========== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/
