Re: variations of UTF-16/UTF-32 and browsers' interpretation (wasRe: browsers and unicode surrogates)

[Tom Gewecke]

Following is result of Mac OS X and OmniWeb browser on
<http://jshin.net/i18n/utftest>

5 cases of proper display:

+Y, BE, 16, UTF-16 and UTF-16BE
+Y, LE, 16, UTF-16
+N, BE, 16, UTF-16 and UTF-16BE

All the rest showed only the ascii correctly.