On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, [iso-2022-jp] ろ〇〇〇〇 ろ〇〇〇 wrote: > In the Unicode 3.0 book, WHY ON EARTH are the Han digits (you know them) > not listed directly with the other numerics? They are given their own > category. (I have always wondered why the Han digit 1 (一) is not called > HAN DIGIT ONE, etc.)
How would you distinguish the common form U+4E00 from the ancient form U+5F0C, the Japanese anti-fraud form U+58F1, the Chinese anti-fraud form U+58F9, and the (historical) variant form U+2092A? Thomas Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]