|
I, myself, am fascinated with this thread. I concur with
Peter. Our system of characters grew out of a di-chromatic world. Every phase in
the history of writing was affected by the tools at hand and was dated by
it. The word for scribe in hieroglyphics is a pen and (two colour) ink horn. We
wouldn't recognise it today until someone pointed it out. Cuneiform has the
distinctive wedge shape because of the specific specie of plant used. Serifs
came about through experimentation because carving in stone tended to crack
unless it was done that way. Something about relieving the stresses in the
material, I think. The indent for paragraphs came about from books being printed
and leaving room for an illustrator to add the versals, decorated initials. I've
read about font designers having to accommodate the differences in the type of
press. Letterpress left a visible dent in the paper that added to the "colour"
or total ratio of black to white of the text area. If the same exact font were
chosen for web offset printing, the ratio would be off. I'm sure Michael could
elaborate on the design of fonts for electronic media.
My point is this. There is a cultural inertia to use a modern
technology to accommodate an earlier form. I've heard it described as "instant
ivy". "Ye olde shoppe" on the High Street. Unicode bowed to some of that
pressure by including heritage characters like dingbats. The purpose of defining
character glyphs is the goal. Leave the artistic expression of those glyphs to
the font designers. There has always been the urge to embellish the text with a
bit of colour, but that's what it is, an artistic embellishment. As soon as it's
legislated, artists will try to do it differently just to be
different.
P.S. Petra Sancta was a Jesuit who devised a shorthand
called "tricking" of recording heraldic shields in black and white. The demand
for such books outstripped the ability to paint them in. It was later adapted to
other things with a limited palette like vexillology, the study of
flags.
P.P.S. The design of heraldry and of flags grew out of the
need to be seen on a battlefield or at sea. This dictated the use of bold,
easily recognisable colours and patterns. The embellishments people employed in
their armorial achievement soon grew so cluttered as to render it
unrecognisable.
Wm Se�n Glen
|
- Re: Chromatic font research Sampo Syreeni
- Re: Chromatic font research John Cowan
- Re: Chromatic font research Herman Ranes
- Re: Chromatic font research Sampo Syreeni
- Re: Chromatic font research Timothy Partridge
- Re: Chromatic font research Philipp Reichmuth
- RE: Chromatic font research Figge, Donald
- RE: Chromatic font research Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Chromatic font research Stefan Persson
- Re: Chromatic font research Peter_Constable
- Serifs (Was: Chromatic font research) Wm Se�n Glen
- Serifs (Was: Chromatic font research) John Hudson
- Re: Chromatic font research Sampo Syreeni
- Re: Chromatic font research William Overington
- Re: Chromatic font research Michael Everson
- Re: Chromatic font research William Overington
- RE: Chromatic font research Marco Cimarosti
- RE: Chromatic font research Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Chromatic font research Peter_Constable
- RE: Chromatic font research Suzanne M. Topping
- Re: Chromatic font research Daniel Yacob

