Doug Ewell wrote: > I think the reason the Braille block is legitimate, and doesn't fall > into the codes-for-codes trap you described, is that it is a flexible > cipher rather than a fixed one. The same Braille symbol can stand for > different letters depending on which script, or even which alphabet > within the same script, it is used to represent. And then > there's Grade > 2 Braille, which completely breaks the "simple cipher" model.
I stand corrected. _ Marco
