Michael Everson <everson at evertype dot com> wrote: >> It's a straight cipher for the Latin alphabet, so don't bother >> suggesting it for ConScript. They have a policy against ciphers, >> even historic ones like the Utopian "alphabet" originally printed >> in 1516: > > Do you object to that? The example isn't even phonetic; it writes > exactly the same, letter for letter, e.g. gymnosophon.
Not at all. Ciphers are out-of-scope for ConScript by definition. But *somebody* might want to create a PUA encoding for them (e.g. so they can be intermixed with unenciphered Latin script, as the Disney-script sites do). I wanted to make sure nobody wasted their time, or yours or John Cowan's, by preparing and submitting a ConScript proposal for these things. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California
