> James Kass: > This is a new one. Is this documented? There is a KB (I think!?). It's easy enough to reproduce as well. Install Latha and have a look at MS's web fonts demo site. (See John Hudson previous mail on this list as well.)
> > There are Indic fonts without Latin coverage. The solution is not > to throw away the Uniscribe, but to throw away those Indic fonts > which lack Latin glyphs. What the heck good would those Indic fonts > be without Uniscribe's OpenType support? Couldn't display Indic > right and lacking ASCII... > > (In other words, if a font is developed and licensed only for WinNT > applications, what's it doing on a Win 9x system in the first place?) Right. Uniscribe and certain OpenType Layout fonts are develope for Win2k and above. They should not be installed on Win9x platforms. > > I'm running Win ME as the main system here and have a W2K system > just for testing. I've been running the most advanced versions of > Uniscribe on my Windows 9x platforms for years with no problem. That's great for you. There are quite a few other versions of Win9x though. Also, you are probably not doing too much font embedding work, right!? Regards, em2 Solutions Michael Jansson
