> I do not feel at all comfortable continuing with this discussion, and > would prefer to have my questions about Unicode (its staffing levels)
Discussion about staffing levels is not appropriate to this list, but the current staff is a matter of public record: http://www.unicode.org/unicode/consortium/directors.html Magda Danish, Administrative Director (Mountain View, California) Rick McGowan, Senior Software Engineer (Mountain View, California) Julie Allen, Senior Editor (Seattle, Washington) > and WG 2 (its timetable for 10646) answered, This can easily be found by checking current resolutions of WG2. Those are also a matter of public record, being open (unlocked) SC2 documents. The latest are the resolutions from the Dublin WG2 meeting: http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/open/02n3614.pdf Generic access to SC2 documents via the document register is at: http://lucia.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/servlets/ScmDoc10?Com_Id=02 The overview of SC2's program of work can be found also via the dkuug-hosted SC2 website: http://www.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/open/pow.htm The next WG2 meeting is to be held jointly with SC2, in Tokyo, December 9 - 13. At that meeting we expect that the current amendments out for ballot as FPDAM's (Amendment 1 to 10646-2 and Amendment 2 to 10646-1) will have a resolution of comments, be issued as DAM's, shortly thereafter to be approved and published. The additions for Unicode 4.0 will be synchronized with those two amendments. > as more appropriate to this > list. --Ken