James Kass scripsit: > Even if a new character is proposed and accepted, font developers > will probably just copy their own interpretation of 'missing > character' from Glyph ID Zero into the new slot. What would > be gained?
It would be guaranteed that every font would encode this character using its missing-glyph glyph; in short, no font would have a mapped glyph for the character, but it is a legitimate character in every other way. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
