On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 04:58:08 -0800 (PST), Marco Cimarosti wrote: > > I have tried to follow the discussion about the errors in field "kMandarin" > of file "Unihan.txt" but, after a while, I lost my way with all those > dictionary references... > > Could someone kindly make a short summary of the situation? Here are my > biggest ???'s:
Here's my take on the situation : > > - Are the errors really there? Yes. > - Any estimate as to how many entries are affected? I estimate about 10% of basic CJK, in other words 2,000+ > - Is it only kMandarin affected or also any other fields? I don't think any other fields are affected. > - Any estimates for when it will be possible publish a fixed version? I'll let Mr. Jenkins answer that one. > - Any suggestion for interim work-arounds (e.g., an older version of the > file, an alternative source)? Use the Unihan database for Unicode 3.0 at http://www.unicode.org/Public/3.0-Update/Unihan-3.txt This is the latest uncorrupted version. Hope this clarifies the situation. Andrew
