Guys, fair enough. I thought the semi-serious name would have been indication enough for someone to hit the delete key and remove the name, but I guess not.
I'll probably hear from a Mr. Max Delete from the Exchange next wanting to know why I instigated this. Reminds me of the story of the support call for the instructions that said "insert disk1. insert disk2 when prompted. insert disk 3 when prompted." and the caller only inserted and never removed the previous disks... ;-) I should have stopped at "There probably isn't a one-size fits all solution". tex Curtis Clark wrote: > > Lars Marius Garshol wrote: > > * Tex Texin > > | > > | There probably isn't a one-size fits all solution, short of those > > | not wanting a response changing their reply-to address to > > | "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". > > > > That's dangerous. Quite a few email clients will then create replies > > that go only to that address, so nobody will see them at all... > > > > Actually, no, the postmaster of the Montréal Stock Exchange (me.org) is > likely to see every one of them. > > The only domain name that is reserved is example.com/org/whatever. Every > other domain is potentially in use. > > -- > Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/ > Mockingbird Font Works http://www.mockfont.com/ -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Tex Texin cell: +1 781 789 1898 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Xen Master http://www.i18nGuy.com XenCraft http://www.XenCraft.com Making e-Business Work Around the World -------------------------------------------------------------
