Frank Tang wrote: > I think that is a very commn mistake people WILL make.
Especially if they keep telling each other the wrong thing, and then rely on folklore about the standard as their source of information. The ultimate source of information about a standard is the standard itself. If language in the standard is unclear and is leading people to misinterpretations, then the UTC and the editors want to know about that. But I believe that in this particular instance, the text of Unicode 4.0 (forthcoming) will be quite clear and unambiguous. --Ken > > Doug Ewell wrote: > > >Thanks to all who pointed out that noncharacters, unlike surrogate code > >points, are NOT illegal or invalid in UTF-8 or any other CES. I don't > >know why I said they were. (Bad brain! Bad, bad brain!)
