Quoting Michael Everson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > At 16:48 -0500 2003-03-03, John Cowan wrote: > >Mijan scripsit: > > > >> Let's consider the ra+virama+ya case. In the mostpart the ra+virama+ya > is > >> displayed as ya+reph. This obviously seems to be an > >> instance of ambiguous interpretation because ra+virama+ya could > >>also represents > >> ra+ja-phalaa. ya+reph and ra+ja-phalaa are used in different words and > have > >> different meaning. > > > >I'm responding to this message in order to isolate this point. If > >correct, then > >the current model of YA PHALAA is inadequate. > > ZWJ can be used to produce the required differentiation.
I looked at Unicode Standard for meaning of ZWJ. I did not understand how can ZWJ be used for Reph or Ya-phalaa? Mijan ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through http://www.bangladesh.net
