Brian Doyle wrote: > on 5/29/03 9:15 AM, Marion Gunn at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > When a reference to using embryonic ISO 639-3 to > > 'legitimize' SIL's flawed > > Ethnologue is let pass with no comment.... > > Why is Ethnologue flawed?
And how is this more on-topic on a mailing list called "Unicode List" than discussing a banner offered by the _Unicode_ Consortium to flag web pages encoded in _Unicode_? _ Marco
