> 2. It is unikely that the Unicode *logo* itself (i.e. the thing at > http://www.unicode.org/webscripts/logo60s2.gif) will be incorporated > directly in any image that people are allowed to put on their > websites, > because to put the Unicode logo on a product or whatever requires a > license agreement. I.e. the submissions from E. Trager are > out of scope > because they contain the Unicode logo on the left side.
If the goal really is to follow the use of the W3C validation logos-- those validation logos do include the readily recognizable W3C logo. This probably means that W3C made the conscious decision to allow the use of their logo for that particular purpose.
