Stefan Persson asked: > BTW, is it possible > to put a variation selector after another variation selector to > obtaining even more variants?
No. The usage of variation selectors is very clearly circumscribed. The standardized variants HTML file contains a brief synopsis: > The tables here exhaustively lists the valid, registered combinations of > base character plus variation indicator. All combinations not listed in > StandardizedVariants.txt are unspecified and are reserved for future > standardization; no conformant process may interpret them as > standardized variants. Variation selectors and their use are described > in The Unicode Standard. and the TXT file itself says: > # Warning: Only the variation sequences specifically defined in this > file > # are sanctioned for standard use. In all other cases the variation > selector > # cannot change the visual appearance of the preceding base character > from > # what it would have had in the absence of the variation selector. Anything else is non-conformant. (And of course this is only my personal opinion, etc.) Rick