Re: [unicode] Re: conformance for unicode 2.x?

[Barry Caplan]

At 11:54 AM 6/6/2003 -0700, Mark Davis wrote:

We never put the 2.0 Standard online.

Any particular reason why someone (I volunteer if no one else does)  can't type int the conformance section (it is plain English text if it is like the 3.0 chapter 3)?

Also I would be curious how many copies of this extant and extinct book were actually sold so I know how hard it will be to find a copy. OK, I know *I* can find a copy at a colleague and have them photocopy the relelevant section for me, but what about the rank and file developer?

Is this a good thing for this standard to exist only in a long out of print book? RFCs, even the obsoleted ones, live forever online in numerous archives...shouldn't Unicode strive for the same immortality?

I am asking about v2 for a selfish reason, but everything above might as well be about v1 also .....


Barry

 We do, of course, keep copies in
our office, but your best bet is to borrow one from a collegue.

Mark
__________________________________
http://www.macchiato.com
►  “Eppur si muove” ◄

----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry Caplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:14
Subject: Re: conformance for unicode 2.x?


> Thanks Mark, but I had done all that online searching before I
posted to the list. Is the book (which I no longer have a copy of) the
only place where the details for conformance for 2.x are archived?
>
> If so, is that a good idea?
>
> Barry
>
> At 11:09 AM 6/5/2003 -0700, Mark Davis wrote:
>
> >If you start on http://www.unicode.org/ and click on Start Here,
> >you'll get to a page about the Unicode Standard.
> >
> >In the left-hand column, clicking on Versions of the Unicode
Standard
> >will get you to http://www.unicode.org/standard/versions/.
> >
> >In the left-hand column you will see the different versions of the
> >standards. Unicode 2.1.9 takes you to
>
>http://www.unicode.org/standard/versions/enumeratedversions.html#Unic
ode_2_1_9,
> >where you will find the major and minor references. If you look in
the
> >book, you'll find conformance is chapter 3.
> >
> >The Unicode Consortium. The Unicode Standard, Version 2.0
> >Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley Developers Press, 1996. ISBN
> >0-201-48345-9.
> >
> >Clauses may be amended by:
> >
> >Moore, Lisa. Unicode Technical Report #8, The Unicode Standard,
> >Version 2.1, Revision 2. Cupertino, CA, The Unicode Consortium,
1998.
> >
> >Mark
> >__________________________________
> >http://www.macchiato.com
> >â­º  â?oEppur si muoveâ? â-"
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Barry Caplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:34
> >Subject: conformance for unicode 2.x?
> >
> >
> >> I was trying to find the place on unicode.org where conformance
for
> >2.x is defined. I think one of the 2.1.x updates referred back to
> >earlier conformance specs, but I couldn't find them. Any pointers?
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Barry
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 


To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This mailing list is just an archive. The instructions to join the true Unicode List are on http://www.unicode.org/unicode/consortium/distlist.html


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

<<inline: 18ae4c9.jpg>>

<<inline: 18ae4f1.jpg>>